
|
If you were logged in you would be able to see more operations.
|
|
|
|
Original Estimate:
|
Unknown
|
Remaining Estimate:
|
Unknown
|
Time Spent:
|
Unknown
|
|
Issue Links:
|
Duplicate
|
|
|
|
This issue is duplicated by:
|
|
RSRP-40390
Safe delete should show dependent dec...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goal: less user actions in case there're conflicts.
Current behavior:
- If there are no conflicts, then the safe-delete-confirmation is displayed and then the deletion is performed. OK and, basically, nothing to improve.
- If there are conflicts, then the user first sees the safe-delete-confirmation dialog, then the safe-delete-conflicts dialog. The former is unneded because the latter is just as good a confirmation. The first dialog is unnecessary and just annoys a bit.
Proposed behavior:
First, check for conflicts with a standard progress UI. Then:
- If there are no conflicts, display the safe-delete-confirmation that should clearly state that there are NO conflicts, already checked for that.
- If there are conflicts, display the safe-delete-conflicts dialog and so on.
|
|
Description
|
Goal: less user actions in case there're conflicts.
Current behavior:
- If there are no conflicts, then the safe-delete-confirmation is displayed and then the deletion is performed. OK and, basically, nothing to improve.
- If there are conflicts, then the user first sees the safe-delete-confirmation dialog, then the safe-delete-conflicts dialog. The former is unneded because the latter is just as good a confirmation. The first dialog is unnecessary and just annoys a bit.
Proposed behavior:
First, check for conflicts with a standard progress UI. Then:
- If there are no conflicts, display the safe-delete-confirmation that should clearly state that there are NO conflicts, already checked for that.
- If there are conflicts, display the safe-delete-conflicts dialog and so on.
|
Show » |
|